Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giatsis
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. –Juliancolton Happy Holidays 02:31, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Giatsis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable coach. He's borderline because he coached an Olympian, but I couldn't find any WP:RS. DARTH PANDAduel 21:32, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 23:07, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 23:08, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:05, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep Some evidence of notability. More than a lot of the olympic athletes we keep... ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:45, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. My issue is not with his notability but is with his sourcing. DARTH PANDAduel 20:04, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- He wrote this article for what it's worth: [1]. ChildofMidnight (talk) 09:01, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:32, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fabrictramp | talk to me 02:12, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Foxy Loxy Pounce! 23:45, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I concur with Darth Panda's comment above regarding sourcing - we need reliable sources in order to verify the information in the article. I've done an initial search but turned up empty-handed, I'll have a more thorough look though. Wiw8 (talk) 13:19, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.