Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Getting shit on
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G10 by Materialscientist. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:51, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Getting shit on[edit]
- Getting shit on (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable term. No third party sources, etc. Nolelover Talk·Contribs 03:40, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- speedy delete "remember this next time you play call of fags" indicates that this is pure vandalism. Valenciano (talk) 04:03, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per G3. Eeekster (talk) 04:18, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete. I've tagged the page as an attack page, although it'd be speedyable under various other things as well. I'd recommend a blocking of the original editor as they've had other pages deleted for similar reasons and looks to be a vandalism only account.Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 04:31, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.