Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gemini Arabians

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Masters Champions League. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:18, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gemini Arabians[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only trivial coverage found. Fails WP:GNG. Greenbörg (talk) 16:24, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:28, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:28, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:28, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:29, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Masters Champions League. On the whole I tend to think that the one year existence of the league means that the teams are largely non-notable other than in the context of the league. If there's pertinent information other than lists of players then this could perhaps be moved across at the same time. The lists of players might either belong in a table in the league article or just possibly in a standalone article. Overall given the lack of content at the MCL article I'd say that lists could be added without too many problems as has been done at 2017 Pakistan Super League. But that would involve doing so for every team really.

I don't know what the history is of the other team articles. Did they exist as we AfD'd them or were they never created? I forget. Blue Square Thing (talk) 16:05, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:02, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 12:09, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Blue Square Thing: Deletionpedia has at least one article for another of these teams, so that means the articles must have existed and been AFD'd: [1]Moaz786 (talk to me or see what I've been doing) 02:02, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Moaz786: sort of as I remember - I think they were all done in one AfD. As there seems to be so little interest here, I'd suggest a simple redirect. If anyone's that fussed they can go and find the team sheets and recreate them. Blue Square Thing (talk) 08:53, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.