Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geibeltbad Pirna

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. AfD, as often said, is not for cleanup. (non-admin closure) Timotheus Canens (talk) 01:22, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Geibeltbad Pirna

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Written like an add, contains orignal research, does not cite references, & fails WP:Plot guideline MWOAP (talk) 01:46, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:43, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:43, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:43, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - This does not read as a unrecoverable article. It needs some sources but it is factual and some of the overly detailed information (such as prices) can be easily trimmed. Copyright of prose may have been more of an issue if chunks are cut and paste from the original website. I suggest this is raised for urgent recovery at WP:WikiProject Swimming.—Ash (talk) 08:20, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep "Written like an ad" can be improved upon; "Original research"? Which part does this refer to, as I'm not seeing that. "Not citing references" can be sorted out with a bit of searching. For example, it is one of 21 examples used in "Castillo, Encarna (2005). Spa & health club design. Design focus. teNeues. pp. 44–51. ISBN 9783832790745. Retrieved 4 January 2010. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)" (although most of those pages are photos of the place, there is only a short paragraph of text — but the examples in the book are from around the world), plus a couple of other references at Google Books. I assume that your reference to WP:PLOT is about item 3 Excessive listing of statistics: The statistics here are in the form of prose, and look ok, albeit needing a bit of tidying up. AfD is not for cleanup, which is what I feel that this article needs -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 10:13, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Needs trimming, but subject of article appears to be notable. Time would be better spent cleaning up the article. Less time, nicer results. --IP69.226.103.13 | Talk about me. 22:01, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.