Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garbage B-sides

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The information is forked from the singles pages, so merging is not needed. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 15:18, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Garbage B-sides[edit]

Non-notable B-sides. All information is forked from respective singles. Fancruft. Tenacious D Fan (talk) 09:52, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Non-notable to anyone but die-hard fans. Drewcifer (talk) 10:01, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Garbage discography. Agree they are not notable enough for a stand alone article, but they are relevant to discography page, and their inclusion there does no harm. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 16:43, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually consensus has determined that B-sides do not belong in a discography, since a discography lists releases not individual songs. See MOS:DISCOG. indopug (talk) 17:36, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: There's no need to list a bunch of non-notable items. indopug (talk) 17:36, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:50, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Information about b-sides should be in the articles of their respective singles. PC78 (talk) 22:59, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.