Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gansz Trophy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. clpo13_(talk) 19:43, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gansz Trophy[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV independent of the schools. Per WP:NOPAGE, this can be covered briefly at the articles for the respective schools. Let'srun (talk) 16:19, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports, American football, United States of America, Maryland, and Texas. Let'srun (talk) 16:19, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. At first glance, the coverage doesn't look too deep, but there's a lot of it. Haven't had a chance to review it all and make a decision, but here are some examples found in my WP:BEFORE search: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. Cbl62 (talk) 22:04, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 19:04, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 00:15, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. We really a few editors reviewing these sources. Thanks.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:54, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: this is a tough one. I reviewed the sources presented above and in general, each piece of coverage is about 80% run-of-the-mill sports reporting with 1-2 short paragraphs at the end actually discussing the trophy/rivalry as an overview-level topic. As for the references currently in the article, the Dallas Morning News piece similarly offers one short paragraph discussing the matchup, this one is merely a stats database, and the last two are primary sources published by the involved schools' websites. Left guide (talk) 23:41, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.