Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ganapathikurichi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:41, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ganapathikurichi[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is nondescript and listed to require citations Dec 2018; little to no changes have been made since then. MicrobiologyMarcus (talk) 23:38, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the place exists, but I can't find any sources that talk about it. Oaktree b (talk) 15:02, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Tamil Nadu. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:27, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It's a bad article, but it appears to be a genuine settlement, so meets WP:GEOLAND. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:53, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No sources, fails GNG. Per NGEO,"populated places without legal recognition" must meet GNG. BEFORE did not show any WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in depth. // Timothy :: talk 19:49, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Can't even be sure it exists. Hence the exit. -The Gnome (talk) 14:44, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.