Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GamesBids (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:48, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GamesBids[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL). Non notable website that fails the notability guidelines. I have also prodded the creator of the website Robert Livingstone. Sahaib3005 (talk) 18:48, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 February 12. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:10, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:30, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:30, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:31, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:31, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:31, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, the article now appears to have been WP:REFBOMBed which doesn’t really help in establishing notability. Sahaib3005 (talk) 18:06, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, The article had been critically out of date, additional links and information brought it forward 10 years and made it clear that it remains a notable site, frequently mentioned in books and news. I vote to keep. menscerto 20:24, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, the user above seems to have a WP:Conflict of Interest. Sahaib3005 (talk) 12:54, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, Note, source references above were incorrect. Subject is referred to as GamesBids.com, not GamesBids. See NYT - instead search https://www.nytimes.com/search?query=gamesbids.com for long list of hits. Same applies for others. Perhaps article name could be edited to Gamesbids.com for greater accuracy menscerto 19:18, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:02, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 02:42, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.