Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GSL Holdings Ltd.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 12:57, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GSL Holdings Ltd.[edit]

GSL Holdings Ltd. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced for 4 years struggling to find any independent sources which would allow it to pass WP:GNG Theroadislong (talk) 20:55, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • [User talk:Theroadislong] Independent sources now added, so this page doesn't need to be deleted anymore. --206.214.244.218 (talk) 21:45, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:52, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:52, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete per nom - the one new source is a profile on Graham Lee, and might be evidence of his personal notability (though not enough alone to swing it), but certainly isn't of the company - David Gerard (talk) 10:30, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:21, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.