Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fulcrum Wheels

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Campagnolo. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:38, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fulcrum Wheels

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar." It was deprodded by User:Seacactus 13 with no rationale (despite the fact that I explicitly asked for one in the PROD). As I discussed in my Signpost Op-Ed, this is a good example of Yellow-Pages like company spam. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:00, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Cycling, and Italy. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:00, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge. While it has received coverage in many niche publications, I can find nothing about the company that would warrant having an article about it. However, since it is connected to Campagnolo it may be worth merging this content to that article. Chagropango (talk) 12:11, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Campagnolo. Have added the single source cited in this article to Campagnolo. Wikipedia Library search yields many articles mentioning "Fulcrum Wheels" / "Fulcrum wheels", but these mainly discuss the product rather than the subsidiary and thus does not satisfy WP:NCORP. Where the entity is discussed, it is mainly in the context of larger articles about Campagnolo's business strategy. Cielquiparle (talk) 11:11, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Campagnolo as per above, topic fails NCORP criteria for establishing notability. HighKing⁺⁺ 16:13, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.