Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foxfeather

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 00:53, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Foxfeather

Contested PROD. The reason given for the proposed deletion was:Probable autobiography with no claim in article of meeting WP:BIO. Gsearch turns up a number of its, but no independent, reliable sources that show notability; zero gnews, gbook, or gscholar hits. Call me Bubba (talk) 18:13, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:16, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'm the original prodder and still agree with my deletion reason.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:17, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No assertion of notability. Johnbod (talk) 21:43, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Clearly fails WP:N. Tim Ross (talk) 21:52, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nonnotable, self-promotion. NawlinWiki (talk) 23:46, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above...Modernist (talk) 02:04, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per all of above. JNW (talk) 02:09, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.