Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flack-Council-Coleman Reunion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:45, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Flack-Council-Coleman Reunion

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Except for this Facebook page and this newspaper article (which is behind a paywall and may or may not be about this topic), there is nothing published in reliable secondary sources to support notability. Magnolia677 (talk) 15:11, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. ^Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 17:19, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. ^Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 17:19, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence of GNG. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 00:33, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lourdes 16:32, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I can't find any significant coverage. FWIW, the article linked above in the Asheville Citizen & Times for 5 August 1989 is one bullet point under the heading "Religion—Notes" and reads "Jones View, AME Zion Church, Monticello Road, Alexander—The Flack-Council-Coleman reunion service will be at 11 a.m. Aug. 13 at the church followed by dinner at 1:30 p.m. at the Hillside Community Center in Weaverville". It shows that these reunions happen[ed], but does not demonstrate encyclopedic notability or prove out anything else in the article. It sounds like a nice tradition, but not something for Wikipedia to cover. Mortee (talk) 00:44, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This doesn't pass WP:GNG and is wholly unencyclopedic. Natureium (talk) 23:33, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.