Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Five Minutes to Love

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. Nomination withdrawn. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:59, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Five Minutes to Love[edit]

Five Minutes to Love (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NFO and WP:NFSOURCES. I found no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. I did a WP:BEFORE and found nothing suitable or reliable enough to pass WP:NEXIST. The Film Creator (talk) 00:48, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. The Film Creator (talk) 00:48, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment, found a review at DVD Talk, under the name "The Rotten Apple" [1] DonaldD23 talk to me 00:54, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Meets WP:GNG. Also seems to meet WP:NFO#2. This has plenty of coverage in contemporary zines and related books, eg:
    1. There's a full review by Erich Mees in Ecco Magazine issue 19, page 18, 1993. Ecco has a masthead with editor and copy editor listed.
    2. Good size review in The Phantom of the Movies' Videoscope: The Ultimate Guide to the Latest, Greatest, and Weirdest Genre Videos, Joe Kane. 2000. p. 505.
    3. Short capsule review in Famous Monsters of Filmland, Issue 200, May 1993, p 109. Magazine has a full masthead.
siroχo 01:48, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - I've added an external link to the AFI (American Film Institute) page for the film's original title "The Rotten Apple". There's a great lot of information about this film at AFI: History, Details, Credits Synopsis, Genre, etc. On the one hand, this movie is a sort of testament to what a leap upward Rue McClanahan made to the Golden Girls. On the other hand, it's in league with a lot of low-budget films of that era. — Maile (talk) 20:19, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I withdraw this nomination per consensus. The Film Creator (talk) 21:47, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.