Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fing (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:33, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fing[edit]

AfDs for this article:
Fing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:COMPANY. One of the article's sources is dead and the other two include a blog and a promotional website. Also, no other sources establishing notability could be found. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 23:13, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 00:17, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 00:17, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Link referenced as broken has been fixed. More references establishing notability are forthcoming. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jayfish420 (talkcontribs) 19:19, 3 October 2018 (UTC) [reply]
  • Delete - The company fails WP:CORPDEPTH and the article is far too promotional and could, in my opinion, be speedily deleted as an advertisement under G11. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:51, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Fails WP:NCORP and promotional. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:18, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: An article describing a company's personnel and products, presumably the same as was deleted by AfD in 2013. The best of the references is a blog case study, but that concerns a product rather than the company. Searches find mentions of the original product but I am not finding the coverage of the company needed to demonstrate WP:NCORP. AllyD (talk) 11:49, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.