Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Finda.com.au (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. CSD G4 - Recreation of material deleted by discussion, without addressing the reason for deletion (Reliable sources to show notability) — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 15:36, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Finda.com.au[edit]

Non-notable online publication. No independent reliable sources asserting notability have been provided. Mattinbgn\^talk 13:22, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 13:24, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Recreation of a deleted (via a AfD in January) article which has no reliable sources proving its notability. Bidgee (talk) 13:46, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy G4 or, as the recreation appears to be independent and the AFD was only a couple of months ago, redirect to the company. Rd232 ^talk 15:20, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.