Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Find the Lady (1976 film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Donaldd23 (talk) 17:41, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Find the Lady (1976 film)[edit]

Find the Lady (1976 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:NFSOURCES. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 22:26, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Toughpigs (talk) 22:29, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:31, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:31, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep There is one review in the article + [[1]] + [[2]] Donaldd23 (talk) 00:25, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. As at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/It Seemed Like a Good Idea at the Time, the problem here isn't that reliable sources about the film don't exist — it's that the article was created at a time when Wikipedia didn't have a hard rule about actually citing sources in the article yet, and simply didn't get improved as the rule tightened up. But notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not necessarily the current state of the article — if a WP:BEFORE search finds enough sources to get the topic over WP:GNG, then the topic still passes GNG even if none of them are actually in the article yet. And, once again, this gets more than enough hits on newspapers.com to salvage it. Bearcat (talk) 14:29, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • You’ve convinced me to withdraw this nomination, Bearcat. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 16:18, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.