Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fifth-wave feminism in Ibero-America

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Barkeep49 (talk) 02:16, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fifth-wave feminism in Ibero-America

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article consist primarily of original research. It relies heavily on primary sources, it reaches its own conclusions about them. It is also surprising to read things like The feminist movement has entered into a fifth-wave, arriving like a "tsunami". when this is a very early theoretical development. Half of the article seems to be POV fork of related articles. MarioGom (talk) 21:35, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. MarioGom (talk) 21:35, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:25, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:26, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:27, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:28, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:29, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:30, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – original research and advocacy. There are a handful of groups cited in that article that are called "Fifth Wave" or which have used it as some sort of a slogan, but there is no discussion about what the term entails, no analysis, just passing mentions. Most sources are opinion pieces or marginally related articles which happen to mention something named "Fifth Wave" in passing, but nothing which ties these together as a coherent movement. This article draws far too many conclusions not mentioned in the sources attached, a handful of sources are about "fifth wave of globalization" and not feminism at all, but that does not stop this article from using them to build a narrative. – Thjarkur (talk) 22:39, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, PhantomSteve/talk¦contribs\ 10:22, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Full of original research, synthesis, flimsy sources, and bad writing, e.g. the "tsunami" mentions. 2600:1014:B101:D38:2540:8231:3538:9340 (talk) 02:01, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per User:Þjarkur and the IP user above. WP:OR, WP:POVFORK. --Darwinek (talk) 23:09, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.