Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fawcett City

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of locations of the DC Universe. Take merge discussion to talk. (non-admin closure) ミラ P 17:59, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fawcett City

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Usual-variety comic trivia. Fails GNG/WP:NFICTION. BEFORE fails to find anything that's not a PRIMARY source of a WP:PLOT-like fictional bio summary. Deprodded with no rationale. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:10, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:10, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:10, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Toughpigs (talk) 03:58, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The article fails to establish notability. TTN (talk) 13:51, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Let this page stay. It is a main setting for Captain Marvel and other characters from Fawcett Comics. If the unanimous decision is merge, perhaps it can be merged with the fictional cities section of List of locations of the DC Universe. --Rtkat3 (talk) 21:23, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of locations of the DC Universe. The article fails WP:GNG, being sourced entirely to primary sources and sources not actually about the subject. Devonian Wombat (talk) 03:22, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:44, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No reliable, secondary sources appear to discuss the city in any way that would allow it to pass the WP:GNG. The argument that it is notable in-universe are not valid in establishing real-world notability. The proposed merge/redirect target is another mess of cruft that is sourced only to primary sources, and I don't see how adding even more unreferenced cruft would improve matters. Rorshacma (talk) 16:28, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.