Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FXCentrum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. RL0919 (talk) 23:21, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FXCentrum

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a non notable CFD provider that has little history and is promotional, references are promotional, directory listing or low quality review sites showing no particular notability for this company Sargdub (talk) 06:37, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete: promotional references, COI, unreliable sources. Jack4576 (talk) 08:57, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: the article has several links to various independent sites, the links are sites that provide ratings and they are negative but also positive, a small CFD provider that is active mainly in African countries František Végfalvi (talk) 07:19, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:04, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:11, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:11, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:11, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: the article has several links to various independent sites, the links are sites that provide ratings and they are negative but also positive, a small CFD provider that is active mainly in African countries František Végfalvi (talk) 07:19, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The write-up contains numerous references to a variety of independent platforms, which offer mixed reviews, both negative and positive. It belongs to a minor CFD trader predominantly serving countries in Africa. Paolodc13 (talk) 07:44, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Frantisek, did you literally regenerate that sentence in ChatGPT and log in as a sock to Ctrl+V that in? I don't think I've seen a more naked attempt to do so in all my years here. Nate • (chatter) 01:43, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 17:48, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The US and other countries are a no-go with this platform, it's based on a random island in the middle of nowhere for tax purposes (the company's principal officers haven't even bothered to visit Seychelles), and the keep votes only have contributed to this article and nowhere else and sound like they wrote their statements with ChatGPT. It's a COI PROMO SPAM piece that needs to go. Nate • (chatter) 22:12, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Administrator note František Végfalvi is a sockpuuppet of Paolodc13, who also participated in this discussion. I have struck the comments of the former. ✗plicit 00:43, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.