Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FUMBBL

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The consensus is that the website fails WP:GNG with no reliable independent in-depth sources. Just Chilling (talk) 02:02, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FUMBBL[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable website. Google search results in just fewer than 100 hits, none of which are significant discussions of the site in reliable sources. ... discospinster _talk 00:35, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 00:35, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 00:35, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a non-notable online video game website failing WP:GNG with no reliable independent in-depth sources, such as WP:VG/RS. Only reliable source I can find is this short article. There is no reliably secondarily sourced content in the article to merge to Blood Bowl, as it's fully based on primary sources. A redirect would be fine. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 09:28, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Basically nothing I'm seeing that's really usable for sourcing. Couple passing mentions from Kotaku type stuff, and then everything else is pretty much social media. GMG ^talk 14:39, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Basically all references in the current article are links to the FUMBBL website and I was unable to find significant third-party coverage online. Pichpich (talk) 23:48, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No indication of passing GNG/NWEB. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:31, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sources that establish notability for this website are sorely lacking.TH1980 (talk) 06:02, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 08:54, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.