Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FAME ze GREAT
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 01:51, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
FAME ze GREAT[edit]
- FAME ze GREAT (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 18:31, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Article about a self-published book, posted by its author. I cannot find independent evidence that it has even been published: it is not listed on Amazon (though CreateSpace is one of Amazon's self-publishing subsidiaries) or Google Books, and the ISBN cited does not check out. In any case, this falls far short of the standard of WP:Notability (books). This was PRODded, but the author removed the PROD from his other book (see AfD), so to save time I bring it here. JohnCD (talk) 11:07, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Have been unable to find independent reviews or coverage. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:28, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There's absolutely nothing out there about this book that wasn't put out there by the author himself. There's nothing out there to show that this book (or the other book up for AfD) is notable.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 22:20, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I looked for myself, my findings were ditto. Nothing not self-produced. David_FLXD (Talk) Review me 17:27, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unable to find anything online/print/etc that were not self-published. Theopolisme TALK 15:40, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Just not notable with no coverage from reliable sources. --Artene50 (talk) 01:17, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.