Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exploring the Paraguay River

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete -Djsasso (talk) 21:26, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Exploring the Paraguay River

We're not a travel guide, but this article sure is. Raymie Humbert (TrackerTV) (receiver, archives) 02:34, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Paraguay River. The article is not a travel guide, but should be merged into the existing Paraguay River rather than deleted. This nomination is incomplete. There is no AfD tag on the article and the article's creator has not been notified. --Eastmain (talk) 02:43, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It's been proposed for merging with Paraguay River, but once all the travel agent talk is cut out there'll be nothing left. I've given the Wikitravel people a heads up so they can see if there's anything they want to salvage. Reyk _YO! 02:53, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Well written article good enough as a stand alone. Homotlfqa83 (talk) 03:07, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Wikipedia is not a travel guide - Wikitravel is though. Nick Dowling (talk) 03:20, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Wikipedia is not a travel guide. If not deleted, it should be merged to Paraguay River. Tosqueira (talk) 05:57, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not a bad essay, but no place for it here. Meets WP:NOT PAPERS. LonelyBeacon (talk) 06:41, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.