Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evil corporation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Move to Evil corporations in fiction. Consensus is to keep, and it appears that the rename is favored. My interpretation is that this is not intended to be list article of such corporations because at present it difficult to see the inclusion criteria, so the article may be subject to further editing. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 01:37, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Evil corporation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an assemblage of pop-culture references that in no way indicates that the topic is itself encyclopedic. If it is, should we also have articles to list examples of other tropes, such as the evil politician, evil attorney, and evil used car salesman? ~T P W 21:36, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:40, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Maybe this should renamed to "Evil corporations in fiction" instead; that's the subject now, and it would prevent this from during into an opinion article about real-life institutions later. --Closeapple (talk) 02:06, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:27, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - per above: it could be renamed. --Fixuture (talk) 21:42, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - there are good references from reliable sources. It is a well-known theme in science fiction featured in popular movies such as Alien, Robocop, Total Recall and Avatar. Someone Not Awful (talk) 23:57, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Great topic. Agree with the rename. Jeff Quinn (talk) 16:44, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.