Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Everblack Industries

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Shadows Fall. ✗plicit 12:44, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Everblack Industries[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:CORP or WP:GNG. Merge/redirect to Shadows Fall is a possibility if found nn. Boleyn (talk) 11:10, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:05, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:05, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect ~~Delete~~ ~~per WP:A7: No indication of importance (company or organization). ––𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗗𝘂𝗱𝗲^(talk) 01:17, 1 August 2021 (UTC)~~ Changed my mind per 78.26 below. ––𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗗𝘂𝗱𝗲^(talk) 02:44, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Shadows Fall. There is no notability for the vanity label outside of the band, as there are no other artists, notable or otherwise, signed. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 13:22, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with Redirect to the band's page. That way if people search for it, they can find the information there. The label just isn't notable on its own. BuySomeApples (talk) 02:41, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.