Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evan Helmuth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is for the article to be retained. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:13, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Evan Helmuth[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor non-notable actor lacking in-depth, non-trivial support. reddogsix (talk) 02:46, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:48, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Meets general WP:GNG. Minor non-notable actor doesn't isn't an accurate description, he had a main role in a high grossing film. Rusted AutoParts 02:59, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - still fails WP:ENT. reddogsix (talk) 03:28, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If that was to be enforced, many of the lesser notable actors and actresses with articles on this site should be up for deletion. I don't think WP:ENT supersedes WP:GNG. Rusted AutoParts 03:47, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I can't comment on other articles; however, if they do not meet Wikipedia standards I presume they should be deleted. I hardly see evidence of WP:GNG. Where has it "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list." reddogsix (talk) 15:20, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - If WP:GNG is met, not need for other criterias. They are required in case there is no substantial evidence of WP:GNG. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 08:11, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep passes WP:GNG. Artw (talk) 04:13, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I don't see evidence of WP:GNG. Where has it "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list." reddogsix (talk) 15:20, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I am the page creator. I can do some research and add additional sources. They definitely exist: 307,000 hits on a Google search. Skudrafan1 (talk) 15:24, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - It would be nice if indeed there were 307K hit for him; however, there are only 137 for "Evan Helmuth." Hint: look at the bottom of the last page of hits for the true number - don't forget to use quotations. reddogsix (talk) 15:28, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

*My mistake. Skudrafan1 (talk) 17:28, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:49, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:16, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Passes WP:GNG, which supersedes WP:ENT. There are following references I've found [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], etc... Arthistorian1977 (talk) 08:10, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Lead actor for The Devil Inside (which had the third-highest January opening weekend in U.S. box office history btw), as well as supporting roles. Normal filmography for most working, professional film and television actors. Passes WP:GNG Scanlan (talk) 12:34, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:GNG. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 01:15, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as Arthistorian1977 has identified multiple reliable sources that have significant coverage to enable WP:BASIC to be passed Atlantic306 (talk) 19:56, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.