Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eva Angelina

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. (non-admin closure) Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (quip) @ 22:08, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eva Angelina[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable porno actress; article is basically an AVN press-release (as most of these type articles are). Раціональне анархіст (talk) 04:15, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep - Multiple significant performer awards satisfies PORNBIO. Morbidthoughts (talk) 05:59, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Has not "made unique contributions to a specific pornographic genre" or "been featured multiple times in notable mainstream media" (failing PORNBIO).--Раціональне анархіст (talk) 06:27, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1 applies. The non-scene related ones as good enough to pass PORNBIO. Website of the year and Female Performer of the year do lift her out of the crowd. Dunno about best actress video but certainly this is someone who currently meets the required standard. Spartaz ^Humbug! 11:35, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Easily satisfies criteria 1 of WP:PORNBIO. For the record those criteria don't have to be cumulatively met. One only needs to pass a single one, and she easily passes the main criterium as she has won multiple individual awards. -- fdewaele, 2 January 2015, 16;26 CET

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep. Passes WP:PORNBIO with flying colors; has won numerous well-known and significant awards. Notice that Раціональне анархіст's behavior is very similar to that of recently blocked user Redban. He has started several AfD's today for porn articles. Even the comments he's making in the AfD's are similar to those Redban made. Same user? Rebecca1990 (talk) 19:47, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's the second time you've made that accusation today, Rebecca. File it, or stop the personal attacks. I would observe that you appear to be here solely to promote and defend pornography articles, as it's 100% of your activity, and so strong reasons exist to assume you're an industry insider in violation of Wikipedia:TOS.--Раціональне анархіст (talk) 20:52, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In that case may I point out that your own contribution history looks pretty much like a single purpose account geared for deleting articles: the majority of all your edits pertains to AFD's. That's not exactly normal/standard behaviour either... especially for an account which is only active since a month and a half. -- fdewaele, 2 January 2015, 23:17 CET.

Nonsense; I have plenty of "keep" votes, and my interests are all over the map. ...are we through talking about everything except the subject yet?--Раціональне анархіст (talk) 06:11, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Passes WP:PORNBIO criterion 1 with an AVN Award for Best Actress and an XBIZ Award for Best Female Performer. • Gene93k (talk) 02:20, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep - The AVN Award for "Best Actress (Video)", the XBIZ Award for "Female Performer of the Year", and the XRCO Award for "Best Actress – Single Performance" are all major, "well-known and significant industry awards" under the PORNBIO standard.

It's pretty obvious that the original nominee of this AfD (a supposedly "new" Wikipedia user) is likely not at all new to Wikipedia. Guy1890 (talk) 09:10, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.