Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Etinosa Idemudia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 18:36, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Etinosa Idemudia

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't see enough major roles in NOTABLE FILMS (I need at least 3 (WP:NFILMS)) HandsomeBoy (talk) 17:47, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The awards listed, aren't notable except AMAA Awards. But I can't seem to find a source that says she got the nomination. Besides, AMAA does not have a category for best online content. She isn't listed here 12th Africa Movie Academy Awards.HandsomeBoy (talk) 17:52, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ProcrasinatingReader (talk) 18:13, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. ProcrasinatingReader (talk) 18:13, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. ProcrasinatingReader (talk) 18:13, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — I’m not sure I understand how this page has remained on mainspace for this long. Anyway just like the nom, I too can’t see subject of the article satisfying WP:NACTOR. Celestina007 (talk) 18:15, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:45, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable actress.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:06, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The article needs a little clean-up. In the article, I'd consider References 2, 5, 6 and 7 as reliable. I also found a couple of reliable sources where she was interviewed: [1] and [2]. She was also met with controversy a couple of times, including a video scandal. She recently launched her own talent show. With these, the article is good enough to pass WP:NACTOR. My vote stands. I won't reply any further. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 02:56, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Superastig, You may not reply but I’d analyze the sources for you. A portion of the comment you made above reads I'd consider References 2, 5, 6 and 7 as reliable. Okay now let’s commence from ascending order. Now the source number 2 is user generated hence not considered reliable per our policy. The source number 5 has no editorial oversight hence unreliable also. The source number 6 doesn’t even discuss her per se it discusses a movie & not she so this has no value to WP:GNG. The source number 7 does not even discuss her at all or am I missing something? Furthermore the award is not even considered relatively notable. You mentioned that the other two are interviews, okay that means they aren’t independent of her hence doesn’t do much for WP:GNG Generally speaking if a combination of all this ~~unreliable~~ shaky sources confer notability is something I’d have to ask Barkeep49 later to explain to me but I think not! Celestina007 (talk) 22:47, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have not looked at any of these sources. But generically speaking each source is evaluated on its own merits as to whether it goes towards meeting GNG or not and the sum of all the sources decides if the topic is notable under GNG (or not). Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 16:26, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:20, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 03:53, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment — none of the sources are what is required by WP:GNG, neither does subject of our discussion fulfill WP:NACTOR & since beginning of this AFD till now, no new sources have been added to the article to prove notability. Celestina007 (talk) 09:57, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.