Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ericsson T28

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep and added unreferenced tag. --JForget 00:56, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ericsson T28[edit]

Non-notable cellular phone. Insufficient references exist to build a viable Wikipedia article. {{prod}} removed without comment, so we're at AfD. Mikeblas (talk) 18:05, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep What makes this article less notable than the myriads of other cellphone articles? Insufficient references is not valid reason for deletion. --antilived^{T | C | G} 07:08, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Insufficient references is a valid reason for removal. Without verifiable references, the article is original research and can't stay here. If there's too few sources available to make enough references, which I believe to be the case for this topic, the topic isn't notable. Either way, this topic doesn't establish its own notability in a verifiable way. -- Mikeblas 15:34, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 12:45, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep- This article was of course of suitable length to be kept but the following items should be done by wikipedians whom are either users of the phone/ex-users/telecommunications experts or any person whom does had a general and accurate knowledge of the phone.

To create more devised information such as features and something more.

To create a list of all the specifications of the phone.

Add in photos.

Create references which are notable.

Above all- the page does not deem so poorly created to be assessed to be deleted. If not, all of he stubs should be deleted above all and wikipedia would be much of a hollow encyclopedia.--Quek157 14:02, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence of notability. Edison 18:58, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - after reading Quek157's comment I say keep. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 03:00, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I think there should be a total review of this cell-phone issue. I hope I don't offend anyone by saying so, but I have started to dislike what seems to be a salami-tactic used to delete all the cell-phones. Also, it is my conviction Wikipedia should - in general- have an article of all cell-phones with notable sources, so people comming and looking for information, will find it here. Greswik (talk) 14:56, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.