Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric van den Ing
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 17:42, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Eric van den Ing[edit]
- Eric van den Ing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An art dealer who specializes in a particular form of Japanese art, and has written about it some. However, his books don't appear to have made any impact (nor even received any reviews from any major sources). Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:27, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. Fails WP:WRITER as he is not well-known, widely-cited, or original. The only thing that gave me significant pause was that he is an editor/writer for Andon, the magazine of a notable organization, but I think it is not notable in itself. King Jakob C2 16:24, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (gab) @ 17:25, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (converse) @ 17:26, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (babble) @ 17:26, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (lecture) @ 17:26, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete While the works exist and are well-enough received, the author does not meet N. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 21:45, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.