Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/England national rugby union team – Results 2000–present

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 03:25, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

England national rugby union team – Results 2000–present (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has not been updated since 2008 and contains same information as List of England national rugby union team results 2000–09 Bcp67 (talk) 07:21, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Rahat (Talk * Contributions) 09:14, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Rahat (Talk * Contributions) 09:15, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Rahat (Talk * Contributions) 09:15, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:42, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:42, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sing! 07:31, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Very obvious candidate for deletion given there are separate articles for 2000-2009 and 2010-2019 and there is no obvious place to redirect an article of this title. I'd say this could certainly have been deleted by PROD without the need for an AfD discussion. Aspirex (talk) 07:42, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA1000 17:09, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.