Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elstree (song)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Withdrawn by nominator, but there were delete/merge !votes, so technically closure on that basis is improper. However, there has been expansion of the artice that appears to address all objections raised previously. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 00:46, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Elstree (song)[edit]
The result of the discussion was Keep. Thanks Ajsmith141. Withdrawn by nominator. EditorE (talk) 01:01, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Elstree (song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Similar to the article Clean, Clean, this song is not notable enough to have it's own article. Yes, maybe the song was covered by Gigi D-Agostino and there was a music video, but I was unable to find any in-depth information on this song. EditorE (talk) 18:02, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme (talk) 00:01, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep—Elstree, remember me!—as a single by a notable group from a notable album; alternatively, merge and redirect to The Age of Plastic. Newyorkbrad (talk) 00:52, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:NSONG and WP:Music Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 04:53, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to The Age of Plastic. Lacks enough content for a standalone article given the existence of a suitable merge target. --Michig (talk) 08:55, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per Michig above, currently lacks the required WP:RS to stand on its own feet. hmssolent\You rang? ship's log 14:11, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. As with the "Clean, Clean" article, I have expanded the "Elstree" article and expect that further information/sources including critical reception could be found outside of the internet. Ajsmith141 (talk) 19:57, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.