Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ellorum Vazhavendum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. joe decker ^talk 16:21, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ellorum Vazhavendum[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails to demonstrate the notability of the subject. With its only source a song book from the film, there is no evidence that the film has "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Eddie Blick (talk) 19:03, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: There is a book by Film News Anandan that can help expand this. I'll try using it tomorrow. --Kailash29792 (talk) 19:16, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kailash, Only the page showing the list of films released in 1962 is available. The page containing details of this film is not available - even in the printed book. The author has said/lamented in his another book titled "Sidharadikkappatta en saemippu karuvoolam" that many of his database pages were lost by the printer.--UKSharma3 05:42, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

. --Kailash29792 (talk) 05:48, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:15, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:15, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have expanded the Soundtrack section, added external links and added a citation of a book published recently.--UKSharma3 05:15, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Now I added a Bibliography quoting an authentic book in which the name of this film and year are recorded.--UKSharma3 08:42, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 02:15, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:54, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.