Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Education Without Borders (Sudan)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America1000 02:50, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Education Without Borders (Sudan)[edit]

Education Without Borders (Sudan) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, the two citations included are not reliable sources JMHamo (talk) 09:08, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - Apparently not linked to Education Without Borders (NGO) ~Kvng (talk) 14:38, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Evidence of notability found in HighBeam search. I have added some of these to the article's talk page for future improvement. ~Kvng (talk) 14:46, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and restart at best because these sources and information simply suggest it was a local event, this is best restarted so it can have a clean start. SwisterTwister talk 23:57, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 01:37, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:31, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:31, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:31, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Does appear to meet WP:ORG, even if "the two citations included are not reliable sources." The news links in the Afd clearly show more WP:RS. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:37, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:22, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.