Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edge (shaving gel)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Eternal Shadow Talk 20:41, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edge (shaving gel)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This brand lacks the kinds of sourcing required under WP:NCORP. Coverage is, instead, things like churnalism or not significant (including multiple articles about a tie in to Assassin's Creed). Should be redirected to a parent brand given that notability is not inherited. Barkeep49 (talk) 01:26, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I have seen that there appear to be some additional sources that could be used to support this article, which I will try to add to the article. I'm not sure what Assassin's Creed has to do with this, since I couldn't find that mentioned in the article at any time in the history. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 01:57, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It was mentioned in several articles I found while doing a BEFORE. I look forward to seeing what sources you bring forth to demonstrate notability. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:59, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I've already added some more sources. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:47, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:18, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Edgewell Personal Care#Brands, its current owner. Nate • (chatter) 03:08, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:21, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The content regarding the lawsuits is worth covering. I wouldn't object to the merge User:Mrschimpf proposes if this content was kept.. — Charles Stewart (talk) 15:03, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 17:56, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as a popular, well-known brand. I note (1) I've used this product, and (2) this product is used a lot by men of color because it helps with Pseudofolliculitis barbae and we are trying in 2020 to expand our articles of interest to POC. Bearian (talk) 16:52, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.