Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dusty & Stones (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Keep !votes were not contested. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 04:35, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dusty & Stones[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet the notability guidelines for music, and many of the edits were made by Lisa Msibi, one of the group members.

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Africa. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:10, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep They have coverage in a South African newspaper that seems RS [1]. The Swaziland newspaper quoted is also probably a RS. I'll keep digging. Oaktree b (talk) 20:04, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think this is what's covered in the article [2]. An american TV station did a story about them when they went to Idaho [3]. A search on .ie websites was a bust. Oaktree b (talk) 20:06, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
and a brief mention here [4]. Oaktree b (talk) 20:10, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as has significantly coverage in a Swaziland national newspaper as detailed above as well as a South African national newspaper as well as additional coverage so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 03:02, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.