Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dust Waltz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:47, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dust Waltz[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBOOK. No significant coverage in multiple reliable sources other than this short review in a Vernon Press published book: [1] Mika1h (talk) 17:28, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Mika1h (talk) 17:28, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 November 11. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:42, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:32, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:49, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this. It barely looks like a publisher's release information. No sources indicate notability of any kind. Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 09:09, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Significant coverage at [2]. It appears in the index of [3] so I assume there's something usable there. Notability does appear to be marginal so a merge could also be a good solution. ~Kvng (talk) 18:23, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Right now, looks like No consensus. If it was a Merge, what would the target article be?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:00, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails GNG and NBOOK. No sources in article, above or in BEFORE showed WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth from WP:IS WP:RS. // Timothy :: talk 17:02, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.