Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dunajec Nowy Sącz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 16:22, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dunajec Nowy Sącz[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2010. No sources but one external link. Fails WP:GNG. UtherSRG (talk) 16:19, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports, Football, and Poland. UtherSRG (talk) 16:19, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:10, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I found [1], [2], and [3], among many more Polish sources. Article needs improvement, not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 17:26, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources above which show notability. Giant Snowman 09:17, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the above. Sufficient sources to support an article. Eluchil404 (talk) 08:31, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources above.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 23:41, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, clearly passes GNG.--Ortizesp (talk) 05:02, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.