Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dorian Brooks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. v/r - T P 15:38, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dorian Brooks

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSPORT and appears to fail WP:GNG after a good faith search. He was on the active roster for the Super Bowl, but was listed as inactive and has since left the team and for all intents and purposes, is retired. The PROD was contested by the creator. Giants27(T|C) 02:36, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Giants27(T|C) 02:37, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Giants27(T|C) 02:37, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as does not meet WP:NGRIDIRON or WP:NCOLLATH for his collegiate career. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 22:30, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NGRIDIRON and WP:NCOLLATH, having never played a notable professional game or won significant award in college. There was already a precedent in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrian Battles that offensive linemen on practice squads of Super Bowl teams are not inherently notable, and Battles was on the winning team and had some WP:BLP1E coverage, unlike Brooks. The WP:ROUTINE coverage could be synthesized to create a well-sourced bio (there are alot of Ghits), but there's no hiding the lack of WP:IMPACT in his story for a standalone article. —Bagumba (talk) 23:26, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:ATH. Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:24, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.