Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diliman Preparatory School

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 22:14, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Diliman Preparatory School[edit]

Diliman Preparatory School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL. The article violates WP:OR and WP:PROMOTION. WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES states that "Secondary schools are not presumed to be notable simply because they exist." —hueman1 (talk contributions) 16:23, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. —hueman1 (talk contributions) 16:23, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —hueman1 (talk contributions) 16:23, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. —hueman1 (talk contributions) 16:23, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete All that's in the article is two primary sources and a dead link. Plus, the only stuff that came up in a WP:BEFORE when I looked were some name drops in books that mentioned people who go to or work there. Along with a few local news articles about their swim team. There's nothing from what I can tell that would pass WP:NORG though. Which is the relevant notability guideline since this a private school. Maybe WP:GNG, but barely (if at all). It doesn't really matter if it does or not anyway though since the GNG does not work for private schools anymore. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:03, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:52, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.