Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital economics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:47, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Digital economics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Original research bordering on something made up one day. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 10:50, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WikiDan61, seems also to be a bit of an advertisement in first section. 123 Hedgehog 456 12:03, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-article, looks like someone's notes.Jonathanwallace (talk) 14:31, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Atrociously written and certainly not notable. AndrewvdBK (talk) 19:04, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Not that I'm arguing for the retention of this article, but "atrociously written" is never a reason to delete an article. (See WP:ATD). Bad writing can be fixed, if the topic merits it. In this case, the topic does not appear to. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 19:43, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Atrocious writing can be grounds for deletion when it gets to the point that no reasonable reader can be expected to make sense of it. This text comes very close to that; and worse, it is broken English vaporing about how we can all get rich on the Internet. It's like 1999 all over again: Main economic principle is growth gains. Do not misunderstand it as efficiency gains. Difference is between doing something every time better and doing different thing with better results. On big scale this is the most significant factor in economic growth. The cogwheels for economic growth are macro and micro economics. Meantime ITC has made more than 30 years. It is already playing a huge role in global economy, but yet it has no clear name. Everybody would agree that the Web we know today will change human habits forever. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 21:33, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.