Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digisay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 20:48, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Digisay[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article makes quite the claim of notability with 20 million subscribers but there's nothing to back it up. Nothing more than corp/WP:ARTSPAM that lacks in any in depth, meaningful coverage in English or Arabic (I asked a native speaker, Alaa, to help.) While we don't use follower count for anything, I would expect a company claiming such significant clients and subscribers to have more than 230 twitter followers, it's basically a scam utilizing wikipedia to legitimize itself. Praxidicae (talk) 14:01, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 14:02, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 14:02, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 14:02, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a scam company which using enwiki article to said "we are trusted"! through an advanced search, I found that there's no sources about this company, with Facebook page (around 18K followers), and two sources (1 + 2) that said it's a scam company! (Advance-fee scam). Thanks @Praxidicae: --Alaa :)..! 14:11, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and lacks third party sources.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:43, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.