Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diabetes Digital Media
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Diabetes.co.uk; there is no support for keeping as is, and redirects are cheap. bd2412 T 03:53, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Diabetes Digital Media[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Diabetes Digital Media (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Parent company of Diabetes.co.uk a notable entity. However, coverage in the article either fails to meet WP:NORG criteria of being signficiant independent second coverage from a reliable source or is actually coverage of Diabates.co.uk. This redirect was reverted by both an IP and now a registered user, if one who appears to be SPA. The article is also promotionally written though not excessively so but is a further reason there should be one article instead of two. Barkeep49 (talk) 14:22, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Barkeep49 (talk) 14:22, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Barkeep49 (talk) 14:22, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Article was boldly redirected twice, but the redirect was contested; ergo, SOFTDELETE is not an option, in my view. This needs an active consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde (Talk) 15:18, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Relisting comment: Article was boldly redirected twice, but the redirect was contested; ergo, SOFTDELETE is not an option, in my view. This needs an active consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde (Talk) 15:18, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Redirect to Diabetes.co.uk where Diabetes Digital Media is mentioned - Epinoia (talk) 21:46, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.