Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delvis Lumpuy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:52, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delvis Lumpuy[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject made one appearance for the Cuba national football team and no longer plays for Villa Clara. I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG (talk) 16:58, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Cuba. JTtheOG (talk) 16:58, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@JTtheOG, I believe he is notable enough since he played at a U-20 World Cup, he is notable enough because he played in one of the worlds biggest competitions, since wp:NTEMP saids that Notability is permanent, if he was notable during the U-20 World Cup (which I say he was since how major the competition is), he is also notable right now. CubanoBoi (talk) 17:13, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notability is demonstrated through WP:SIGCOV. Playing at a U20 World Cup is not sufficient. Robby.is.on (talk) 18:01, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:30, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 13:01, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There is a unbolded, unstated Keep here so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:32, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BeanieFan11 (talk) 00:45, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG, there was no significant coverage I could find in online sources. Pilaz (talk) 09:56, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails GNG, I too am unable to find anything online that might prove otherwise Josey Wales^Parley 20:04, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.