Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dean L. Lourensz (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:43, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dean L. Lourensz[edit]

Dean L. Lourensz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This subject does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NFOOTY. He has never played a competitive senior match for a fully professional club, nor has he ever appeared for his national team at senior level, and there's definitely no evidence that he's notable for any other reason. – PeeJay 08:00, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. – PeeJay 08:04, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:28, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:28, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:29, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - falls far short of coming anywhere near WP:GNG or WP:NFOOTY, also at the age of 18 subject seems too be WP:TOOSOON. Inter&anthro (talk) 03:33, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I can only find match reports which mention this footballer, and there is no sign the article would satisfy the GNG. Jogurney (talk) 15:56, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.