Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/De Marchi
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. J04n(talk page) 00:17, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- De Marchi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Reliable secondary sources unavailable. atnair (talk) 06:30, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:25, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:25, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:26, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:26, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Although both 1 and 2 appear to be based on press releases, they still give a lot of information on this firm that suggests it is a notable firm with a long history in its field. There are probably more reliable sources out there in Italian. On Google News I see 1 and 2 on a quick poke around, showing that the brand is well known in the cycling press. Mabalu (talk) 03:52, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 13:09, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - It appears to be a notable cycling clothing specialty company. [1], [2] are a couple of representative reviews of the clothing. [3] seems a little press releasish out of a trade magazine. I suspect that more sources are available offline given teh age of the company. -- Whpq (talk) 17:46, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.