Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DataparkSearch (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 04:16, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DataparkSearch

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable Internet search engine. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 23:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Ads nothing to Wikipedia SRich (talk) 23:51, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 17:15, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:13, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Copy/Paste comment of HowardBGolden (talk) from the first AfD 6 years ago:

"DataparkSearch is discussed in the following scholarly articles:

"Open source search and research" in Proceedings of the 2006 international workshop on Research issues in digital libraries. Abstract: "In this paper, we present a review of criteria for the evaluation of open source information retrieval tools and provide an overview of some of those that are more popular." Since this article is behind a paywall, I will quote the relevant part: "DataparkSearch is an GPL-licensed open source system for indexing and searching a Web site, group of Web sites, intranet, or local system. DataparkSearch is built on top of a relational database, which must be installed separately."

"Open source libraries for information retrieval" in IEEE Software. I don't have paywall access to this article at home, but I do at work.

Update I read this article at work. It is a dense five page article which compares and contrasts five open source search engines. It has a significant description of each engine. A notable characteristic of DataparkSearch is that it is the only engine of the five that can be used with Chinese, Japanese, Korean and Thai languages. Abstract: "We all use search engines to browse the Internet or our desktops. But how can we engineer such functions professionally into the applications and systems we build? Vesna Hassler of the European Patent Office has looked into several open source libraries for indexing and information retrieval, which you can use for application and system development. She compares a variety of criteria, such as query structure and ranking, and provides useful hints on installation and security as well."

My own research via citeseerx show few other conference proceedings, not sure if enough for notability. However, these sources should have been used to improve the article after the first AfD (exactly as wrote closing admin of said AfD).Pavlor (talk) 10:57, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:30, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 16:07, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- uncited promotional content. No notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:12, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.