Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darren Coleman (IT Professional)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Star Mississippi 13:25, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Darren Coleman (IT Professional)[edit]

Darren Coleman (IT Professional) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Looks like it was previously (soft) deleted under a different title: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darren Coleman (cybersecurity)

Same issues as before, likely to fail WP:NBIO. KH-1 (talk) 09:33, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. KH-1 (talk) 09:33, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Canada. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:37, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:AUTHOR and WP:BIO more broadly for unremarkable career. LibStar (talk) 00:44, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Sources are weak: Forbes "council posts" are just as lousy blog material as the contributor posts. The two local papers are covering a "speech at Harvard" which seems to actually be a pay-to-play run by a consultant/coach booked at the off-campus Harvard Faculty Club. TechTimes is not a WP:RS any more - tons of unmarked "guest posting" and paid placement. Not clear on the notability, really: small firm owner, 1 of 26 authors in a collaborative book of no particular note. Was not able to find much else, although there are a lot of people with that name. Note this was also undisclosed paid editing. Sam Kuru (talk) 01:10, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.