Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danni Daniels

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:39, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Danni Daniels[edit]

Danni Daniels (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to meet WP:GNG bd2412 T 16:21, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:23, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:23, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:43, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:44, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:44, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Fails WP:PORNBIO, WP:ENT and WP:GNG. The article's creator inquired about notability at WikiProject Pornography and since then has loaded the article up with extensive copyright infringement from the cited sources. Fails PORNBIO criterion #1 with only award nominations. PORNBIO criterion #3 says "featured in multiple mainstream media. Does not satisfy WP:ENT with only one notable show. Finally, GNG requires multiple independent secondary sources. This article relies on (and copies from) interviews, which are primary sources. Other sources are about the show. There is only one source left that is plausibly reliable, independent and non-trivial. • Gene93k (talk) 19:15, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete clearly fails WP:PORNBIO, WP:ENT, and WP:GNG. - GretLomborg (talk) 23:20, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete fails all of WP:PORNBIO points and WP:GNG.Arthistorian1977 (talk) 06:06, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.