Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dal Food

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 11:05, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dal Food

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I could find no sources online to establish the notability of that particular sub-branch, though there are a few hits for the main company (for instance here (paywall) or here).

It would be nice to have more eyes on this; I have the gut feeling that the main company should pass notability but I did not find enough for it, so it may be that I missed a lot in my search. Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 11:25, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 11:42, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 11:42, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination, not notable. --Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:04, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:30, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:59, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 19:17, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Unverifiable, lacking reliable sources, and ordinary commodities company without any significant coverage about this company. Bearian (talk) 13:25, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.