Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D. J. Sackmann

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Per WP:BLPPROD Catfish Jim and the soapdish 11:39, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

D. J. Sackmann[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability, no reliable third-party sources, largely unreferenced. The article suffers the same problems it was deleted for back in 2012 but is different enough to not quite meet my standards for G4. Huon (talk) 04:10, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:17, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:17, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Reads like an advertisement. Best, GPL93 (talk) 23:06, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG with lack of significant coverage in multiple independent sources. Does not meet WP:NHOOPS. I'm not sure if his training partner Micah Lancaster is notable either, but at least he has more coverage.—Bagumba (talk) 09:33, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't appear to meet any SNG and lacks the significant indpendent coverage in reliable sources needed to meet WP:GNG. Article reads more like an ad than an encyclopedia. Papaursa (talk) 00:39, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.